Dear collector friends, while looking through my study collection I came across this cliché defect - the first K of KKPOST. Perhaps you have come across something like this before.
15 C [1].jpg
If you have any further information, I would be grateful.
On this topic, a collector from Styria (Austria) also sent me an article from the Austrian Working Group (ARGE Austria) from circular No. 134 (Volume 37 - Letter 1/2024). I have attached it in the appendix. It's in German.
So you can assume that it is a fluted paper with no intention of counterfeiting. I incorrectly assumed some sort of ribbing.
If I understood correctly, it is a fluted paper.
Thank you for your contributions. Now I found another photo that I saved years ago. Ferchenbauer writes here about “horizontal, narrowly fluted paper”.
I received the piece shown below as an exchange from an Austrian collector.
Rippe gefälscht.jpg
I'm assuming it's a fake. Do you know how wrong ribbing like this were made? Do such forgeries appear on all values of the first Centesimi issues? Or is this a coincidence in paper ...
Years ago I was once shown a fluted paper (back) on a 3 Kreuzer stamp. It can sometimes be seen with other values. This corrugation can be seen horizontally and, more rarely, vertically on machine- and handmade paper. Maybe not ribbed, but the ominous fluted machine paper? This is mentioned in the ...
Today I would like to show you a few pieces that are currently occupying me. I couldn't find such (exact) cliché errors in Stritzl's presentation. You may have similar examples in your collection. I look forward to hearing your opinions.
I marked the most important features with a yellow arrow ...
Mr Wolfgang Feichtinger has given a tries in the club magazine Vindobona (2/2019) to present interesting articles about the classification of letter mail from Austria to the old Italian states/Italy until the founding of the General Postal Union. Here I show you his article on the Duchy of Tuscany ...
It wasn't easy, but I think I found the solution, albeit with some uncertainty. This cliché “A225” can also be found on plate 1 next to the St. Andrew's cross and was later placed elsewhere on plate 2. I don't know in which position it was in plate 1 and 2.
I'm trying to determine the position of the A16 in plate 2, but I need your help. There is a vertical stripe of 3 which was at position 69 77 85 . I suspect that the bottom stamp is an A16. Here is a picture:
From October 1, 1916, the postcard porto was divided into two parts: official postcards with an imprinted stamp cost 8 hellers, but private postcards or postcards with an attached stamp cost 10 heller. With this difference of 2 Heller the printing, cutting and perforating of the cards could be ...